Z-Chain
LP-8903
Governance & Ecosystem Architecture
DraftGovernance structure and accountability architecture for the Lux-Hanzo-Zoo ecosystem.
LP-753: Governance & Ecosystem Architecture
Abstract
This LP defines the governance structure and accountability architecture for the Lux-Hanzo-Zoo ecosystem. It establishes how the four layers—finance (Lux), creation (Hanzo), mission (Zoo), and ownership (DAOs)—interact to create a system where transparency builds trust, trust attracts capital, and capital scales verified outcomes.
Principle: Accountability through architecture.
Motivation
Complex ecosystems often suffer from unclear accountability, conflicts of interest, and governance capture. When roles overlap or boundaries blur, it becomes impossible to hold any single entity accountable for failures. Traditional corporate structures concentrate power and extract value from communities.
This architecture establishes:
- Clear role separation - Each layer has distinct responsibilities and accountabilities
- Structural accountability - On-chain verification and third-party audits, not trust
- Community ownership - DAOs steward IP and governance for long-tail value distribution
- Mission alignment - Zoo anchors ethical boundaries across the ecosystem
Ecosystem Architecture
The Four Layers
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ OWNERSHIP LAYER │
│ DAOs: Steward IP and governance for community benefit │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ MISSION LAYER │
│ Zoo: Life-first ethics, public benefit, non-extraction │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ CREATION LAYER │
│ Hanzo: Frontier tech with safety, efficiency, privacy │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ FINANCE LAYER │
│ Lux: Capital deployment, settlement rails, accountability │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Layer Responsibilities
Lux (Finance Layer)
| Function | Description |
|---|
| Capital formation | Raise and structure investment vehicles |
| Capital deployment | Deploy funds to ESG-aligned projects |
| Settlement rails | Build payment and settlement infrastructure |
| Reporting infrastructure | Create transparent reporting systems |
| Accountability mechanisms | Hard-code compliance into funding terms |
Governance role: Financial oversight, investment decisions, LP relations.
Hanzo (Creation Layer)
| Function | Description |
|---|
| Tech incubation | Develop frontier technologies (AI, robotics, quantum) |
| Efficiency architecture | Build systems that reduce cost and risk |
| Safety engineering | Ensure technology is safe by design |
| Privacy-first design | Protect user data by default |
| Verification systems | Create tools to verify claims and outcomes |
Governance role: Technical decisions, safety standards, R&D priorities.
Zoo (Mission Layer)
| Function | Description |
|---|
| Ethical boundaries | Define what is and isn't acceptable |
| Public benefit anchor | Ensure programs benefit all life |
| Non-extraction enforcement | Prevent value extraction from communities |
| Life-first lens | Prioritize living systems in decisions |
| Mission integrity | Hold ecosystem accountable to values |
Governance role: Ethics oversight, mission alignment, veto on harmful activities.
DAOs (Ownership Layer)
| Function | Description |
|---|
| IP stewardship | Manage intellectual property for long-term benefit |
| Community governance | Enable contributor participation in decisions |
| Value routing | Direct long-tail value to contributors |
| Protocol evolution | Guide development of shared protocols |
| Stakeholder representation | Voice for users, workers, communities |
Governance role: Community representation, IP decisions, value distribution.
Accountability Architecture
On-Chain Auditability
| Element | Implementation |
|---|
| Transaction transparency | All fund flows on-chain |
| Milestone verification | Milestone completion recorded |
| Claims registry | All impact claims logged |
| Evidence hashing | Supporting evidence hashed to chain |
| Governance actions | All governance decisions recorded |
Privacy-Preserving Controls
| Control | Application |
|---|
| ZK proofs | Verify outcomes without revealing inputs |
| Selective disclosure | Reveal only what's needed |
| Aggregated reporting | Totals without individual data |
| Encrypted storage | Sensitive data protected |
| Access controls | Role-based data access |
Multi-Layer Verification
| Layer | Verification Method |
|---|
| Finance | Audit trail, fund accounting |
| Creation | Technical review, safety testing |
| Mission | Ethics review, impact assessment |
| Ownership | Community attestation votes |
Governance Bodies
Lux Vision Fund Governance
| Body | Role | Composition |
|---|
| Investment Committee | Investment decisions | Fund managers + advisors |
| LP Advisory Board | LP input on strategy | LP representatives |
| ESG Committee | ESG policy oversight | Cross-functional + external |
Ecosystem Governance
| Body | Role | Composition |
|---|
| Ecosystem Council | Cross-layer coordination | Lux + Hanzo + Zoo + DAOs |
| Ethics Board | Ethical boundary decisions | Zoo-led, multi-stakeholder |
| Technical Council | Technical standards | Hanzo-led, cross-ecosystem |
DAO Governance
| Structure | Purpose |
|---|
| Token voting | Major protocol decisions |
| Delegation | Expert representation |
| Working groups | Specific domain governance |
| Community proposals | Bottom-up initiative |
Decision Rights
Investment Decisions
| Decision | Authority | Consultation |
|---|
| Fund strategy | Investment Committee | LP Advisory Board |
| Individual investments | Investment Committee | ESG Committee |
| Exit decisions | Investment Committee | ESG Committee |
| ESG policy | ESG Committee | Ecosystem Council |
Technology Decisions
| Decision | Authority | Consultation |
|---|
| R&D priorities | Hanzo leadership | Technical Council |
| Safety standards | Technical Council | Ethics Board |
| Open source releases | Hanzo + relevant DAOs | Community |
| Privacy architecture | Technical Council | Ethics Board |
Mission Decisions
| Decision | Authority | Consultation |
|---|
| Ethical boundaries | Ethics Board | Ecosystem Council |
| Mission alignment | Zoo leadership | Ecosystem Council |
| Public benefit criteria | Zoo + DAOs | Community |
| Non-extraction rules | Ethics Board | DAOs |
Ownership Decisions
| Decision | Authority | Consultation |
|---|
| IP licensing | Relevant DAO | Legal, Ecosystem Council |
| Value distribution | DAO governance | Contributors |
| Protocol upgrades | DAO governance | Technical Council |
| Community policies | DAO governance | Ethics Board |
Checks and Balances
Cross-Layer Oversight
| Oversight | Mechanism |
|---|
| Finance → Mission | ESG Committee reviews all investments |
| Mission → Finance | Zoo veto on mission-violating investments |
| Creation → Mission | Ethics Board reviews tech decisions |
| Ownership → All | DAOs can propose policy changes |
Escalation Process
Issue identified
↓
Working group resolution attempt
↓
Council-level review (if unresolved)
↓
Board-level decision (if escalated)
↓
Multi-stakeholder mediation (if contested)
Conflict Resolution
| Conflict Type | Resolution Path |
|---|
| Investment dispute | ESG Committee → LP Advisory Board |
| Technical dispute | Technical Council → Ecosystem Council |
| Ethics dispute | Ethics Board → External mediation |
| DAO dispute | DAO governance → Arbitration |
Transparency Requirements
Public Disclosures
| Disclosure | Frequency | Location |
|---|
| Fund performance | Quarterly | LP reports |
| ESG metrics | Quarterly | Public dashboard |
| Governance actions | As they occur | On-chain |
| Annual impact report | Annual | Public website |
Stakeholder Reporting
| Stakeholder | Reporting |
|---|
| LPs | Detailed quarterly + annual |
| Portfolio companies | Regular check-ins + milestones |
| Communities | Impact updates + feedback |
| Public | Summary metrics + stories |
Audit Requirements
| Audit | Frequency | Scope |
|---|
| Financial audit | Annual | Fund accounting |
| ESG audit | Annual | Impact claims |
| Technical audit | As needed | Safety, security |
| Governance audit | Biennial | Process compliance |
Evolution and Amendment
Policy Updates
| Change Type | Process |
|---|
| Minor clarification | Staff-level, documented |
| Moderate change | Committee approval |
| Major change | Council approval + consultation |
| Fundamental change | Multi-stakeholder process |
Continuous Improvement
| Activity | Frequency |
|---|
| Process review | Annual |
| Stakeholder feedback | Ongoing |
| Benchmark comparison | Annual |
| External assessment | Biennial |
- LP-750: Lux Vision Fund ESG Investment Framework
- LP-751: Environmental Integrity Investment Policy
- LP-752: Social Benefit Investment Policy
- LP-800: ESG Principles and Commitments
- LP-830: ESG Risk Management
- LP-910: Stakeholder Engagement
Changelog
| Version | Date | Changes |
|---|
| 1.0 | 2025-12-17 | Initial draft |