LPsLux Proposals
Governance & Impact
LP-2920

ESG Principles and Commitments

Draft

Foundational ESG framework defining Lux Network's environmental, social, and governance commitments.

Type
Meta
Created
2025-12-16

LP-800: ESG Principles and Commitments

Abstract

This LP establishes the foundational Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) framework for Lux Network. It defines our material topics structure, metrics and targets, verification approach, and known tradeoffs. All other ESG-related LPs (LP-801 through LP-999) reference this document as the canonical source for Lux's sustainability commitments.

Motivation

Blockchain networks face increasing scrutiny over their environmental and social impact. Without a clear ESG framework, networks risk:

  1. Reputational damage from perceived environmental harm
  2. Regulatory challenges as sustainability requirements expand globally
  3. Institutional exclusion from ESG-mandated investment portfolios
  4. Community erosion as stakeholders demand accountability

This LP addresses these challenges by establishing clear commitments, measurable targets, and transparent governance structures. It positions Lux Network as infrastructure that accelerates—rather than hinders—the transition to a sustainable economy.

Mission and ESG Thesis

Lux Network is committed to building blockchain infrastructure that serves humanity and the planet. We believe decentralized systems should accelerate the transition to a sustainable economy, not hinder it. Our ESG thesis: infrastructure-level sustainability creates compounding positive impact because every application built on Lux inherits our environmental and social commitments.

Material Topics

We are accountable for the following material ESG topics, prioritized by impact and stakeholder relevance:

Environmental

TopicMaterialityBoundaryMetrics
Energy consumptionHighValidator network, data centerskWh/tx, PUE
Carbon emissionsHighScope 1, 2, 3tCO2e/year
E-wasteMediumHardware lifecyclekg recycled/year
Renewable energyHighNetwork-wide% renewable

Social

TopicMaterialityBoundaryMetrics
Financial inclusionHighGlobal accessUnique addresses, geo-distribution
Developer communityHighEcosystem growthActive developers, grants disbursed
TransparencyHighAll operationsDisclosure score
User protectionHighDeFi applicationsInsurance coverage, audit rate

Governance

TopicMaterialityBoundaryMetrics
DecentralizationCriticalNetwork controlNakamoto coefficient, validator distribution
Token governanceHighProtocol decisionsParticipation rate, proposal throughput
Regulatory complianceHighMulti-jurisdictionLicenses held, enforcement actions
Third-party riskMediumVendors, partnersVendor ESG scores

Governance Structure

ESG Ownership

RoleResponsibilityAccountability
ESG CommitteeStrategic direction, policy approvalBoard-level reporting
Sustainability LeadDay-to-day execution, reportingESG Committee
Working GroupsTopic-specific implementationSustainability Lead
External AdvisorsIndependent review, benchmarkingESG Committee

Decision Rights

  • Policy Changes: ESG Committee approval, community vote for material changes
  • Target Setting: Annual review with public consultation
  • Incident Response: Sustainability Lead with 24-hour escalation to Committee
  • Disclosure: Quarterly reports, annual audit

Metrics and Targets

Environmental Targets

MetricBaseline (2024)2025 Target2027 Target2030 Target
Carbon intensity (gCO2/tx)TBD-20%-50%Net-zero
Renewable energy (%)TBD50%80%100%
Energy efficiency (tx/kWh)TBD+30%+60%+100%

Social Targets

MetricBaseline (2024)2025 Target2027 Target
Geographic distribution (countries)TBD50+100+
Developer grants ($)TBD$5M$20M
Ecosystem audits (%)TBD80%95%

Governance Targets

MetricBaseline (2024)2025 Target2027 Target
Nakamoto coefficientTBD20+50+
Governance participation (%)TBD30%50%
LP approval rate (%)TBDTrackTrack

Verification and Assurance

Internal Controls

  1. Automated Monitoring: On-chain metrics tracked in real-time
  2. Manual Review: Quarterly reconciliation of off-chain data
  3. Cross-Functional Audit: Annual internal audit by independent team

External Verification

TypeFrequencyStandardProvider
Carbon accountingAnnualGHG ProtocolTBD (qualified auditor)
ESG disclosureAnnualGRI StandardsTBD
Security auditContinuousCustomMultiple (rotation)
Financial auditAnnualGAAP/IFRSTBD

Third-Party Attestations

  • SOC 2 Type II: Target 2025 (infrastructure controls)
  • ISO 14001: Target 2026 (environmental management)
  • ISO 27001: Target 2025 (information security)

Known Tradeoffs

We are transparent about tensions in our ESG approach:

Performance vs. Sustainability

  • Tradeoff: Sub-second finality requires always-on validators
  • Mitigation: Energy-efficient consensus (Quasar), renewable energy requirements
  • Disclosure: We will report energy cost per transaction honestly

Decentralization vs. Efficiency

  • Tradeoff: More validators = more resilience but more energy
  • Mitigation: Minimum viable validator set with geographic distribution requirements
  • Disclosure: We optimize for decentralization first, then efficiency

Privacy vs. Transparency

  • Tradeoff: Some ESG data involves confidential business relationships
  • Mitigation: Aggregate reporting, third-party attestation without raw data
  • Disclosure: We will explain what we can't disclose and why

Speed vs. Thoroughness

  • Tradeoff: Rapid protocol evolution may outpace ESG review
  • Mitigation: ESG checkpoint in LP approval process
  • Disclosure: We will flag LPs that have incomplete ESG analysis

Compliance and Enforcement

Self-Enforcement

  • All core contributors commit to ESG training
  • ESG considerations required in LP submissions
  • Quarterly ESG scorecard for protocol health

Ecosystem Enforcement

  • Major ecosystem grants require ESG attestation
  • Validator selection criteria include sustainability metrics
  • DeFi protocol listing guidelines include security/audit requirements

Escalation Path

  1. Informal: Working group discussion
  2. Formal: ESG Committee review
  3. Public: Community governance vote
  4. External: Regulatory notification (if required)
  • LP-801: Carbon Accounting Methodology
  • LP-810: Green Compute & Energy Procurement
  • LP-820: Network Energy Transparency
  • LP-830: ESG Risk Management
  • LP-840: Impact Disclosure & Anti-Greenwashing Policy
  • LP-850: Standards Alignment Matrix
  • LP-860: Evidence Locker Index

Changelog

VersionDateChanges
1.02025-12-16Initial draft

Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.