Data Availability Research
Research on data availability solutions and storage optimization for Lux Network
Abstract
This research LP explores data availability (DA) solutions for the Lux Network, analyzing how to ensure data remains accessible for validation while optimizing storage costs. It examines different DA approaches, their trade-offs, and how Lux's multi-chain architecture can leverage specialized chains for efficient data availability.
Motivation
Data availability is crucial for:
- Scalability: Enable high throughput without storing everything on-chain
- Security: Ensure data can be validated when needed
- Cost Efficiency: Reduce storage costs for users and validators
- Decentralization: Prevent data withholding attacks
- Interoperability: Support rollups and light clients
Current State
Data Storage in Lux
- C-Chain: Full EVM state storage
- X-Chain: UTXO model with pruning
- P-Chain: Validator and chain data
- Storage Costs: Growing with adoption
Current Data Patterns
// Data usage across Lux ecosystem
interface DataUsageProfile {
chain_data: {
c_chain: {
state_size: "50GB+";
growth_rate: "1GB/month";
pruning: "Limited";
};
x_chain: {
utxo_set: "10GB";
growth_rate: "200MB/month";
pruning: "Spent outputs";
};
};
external_data: {
ipfs: "NFT metadata, images";
arweave: "Permanent storage needs";
centralized: "High-frequency data";
};
}
Research Findings
1. Data Availability Sampling (DAS)
Implementation for Lux
// Data availability sampling with erasure coding
contract DataAvailabilitySampling {
struct DataCommitment {
bytes32 root; // Merkle root of data
uint256 size; // Original data size
uint256 chunks; // Number of erasure coded chunks
uint256 minChunks; // Minimum chunks to reconstruct
uint256 timestamp;
address submitter;
}
mapping(bytes32 => DataCommitment) public commitments;
mapping(address => uint256) public samplerRewards;
uint256 public constant SAMPLING_RATE = 20; // Sample 20% of chunks
uint256 public constant ERASURE_RATE = 2; // 2x redundancy
// Submit data commitment
function submitData(
bytes32 dataRoot,
uint256 dataSize,
bytes32[] calldata chunkRoots
) external returns (bytes32 commitmentId) {
uint256 numChunks = chunkRoots.length;
uint256 minChunks = numChunks / ERASURE_RATE;
commitmentId = keccak256(
abi.encodePacked(dataRoot, block.timestamp)
);
commitments[commitmentId] = DataCommitment({
root: dataRoot,
size: dataSize,
chunks: numChunks,
minChunks: minChunks,
timestamp: block.timestamp,
submitter: msg.sender
});
emit DataCommitted(commitmentId, dataRoot, numChunks);
}
// Light clients sample random chunks
function sampleAvailability(
bytes32 commitmentId,
uint256[] calldata chunkIndices,
bytes[] calldata chunkProofs
) external {
DataCommitment memory commitment = commitments[commitmentId];
uint256 requiredSamples = (commitment.chunks * SAMPLING_RATE) / 100;
require(
chunkIndices.length >= requiredSamples,
"Insufficient samples"
);
// Verify each chunk proof
for (uint256 i = 0; i < chunkIndices.length; i++) {
require(
verifyChunkProof(
commitment.root,
chunkIndices[i],
chunkProofs[i]
),
"Invalid chunk proof"
);
}
// Reward sampler
samplerRewards[msg.sender] += SAMPLING_REWARD;
emit AvailabilitySampled(commitmentId, msg.sender, chunkIndices.length);
}
}
2. Specialized DA Chain Design
Z-Chain as Data Availability Layer
// Z-Chain optimized for data availability
contract ZChainDataAvailability {
struct DataBlob {
bytes32 id;
uint256 size;
uint256 expiryBlock;
bytes32 kzgCommitment; // KZG polynomial commitment
address publisher;
uint256 fee;
}
mapping(bytes32 => DataBlob) public blobs;
mapping(address => bytes32[]) public publisherBlobs;
// Publish data with KZG commitment
function publishBlob(
bytes calldata data,
uint256 retentionBlocks
) external payable returns (bytes32 blobId) {
// Calculate KZG commitment
bytes32 commitment = computeKZGCommitment(data);
// Calculate storage fee
uint256 fee = calculateStorageFee(data.length, retentionBlocks);
require(msg.value >= fee, "Insufficient fee");
blobId = keccak256(
abi.encodePacked(commitment, block.timestamp)
);
blobs[blobId] = DataBlob({
id: blobId,
size: data.length,
expiryBlock: block.number + retentionBlocks,
kzgCommitment: commitment,
publisher: msg.sender,
fee: msg.value
});
publisherBlobs[msg.sender].push(blobId);
// Store in specialized DA storage
_storeInDALayer(blobId, data);
emit BlobPublished(blobId, commitment, data.length);
}
// Verify data availability without downloading
function verifyAvailability(
bytes32 blobId,
uint256 index,
bytes calldata proof
) external view returns (bool) {
DataBlob memory blob = blobs[blobId];
require(block.number < blob.expiryBlock, "Blob expired");
return verifyKZGProof(
blob.kzgCommitment,
index,
proof
);
}
}
3. Rollup Data Availability
Optimistic and ZK Rollup Support
// DA for Layer 2 solutions on Lux
contract RollupDataAvailability {
struct RollupBatch {
uint256 rollupId;
uint256 batchNumber;
bytes32 stateRoot;
bytes32 dataRoot;
uint256 timestamp;
address sequencer;
}
mapping(uint256 => mapping(uint256 => RollupBatch)) public batches;
mapping(uint256 => address) public rollupContracts;
// Sequencers post batch data
function postBatch(
uint256 rollupId,
uint256 batchNumber,
bytes32 stateRoot,
bytes calldata transactions
) external {
require(
msg.sender == getRollupSequencer(rollupId),
"Not sequencer"
);
// Compute data commitment
bytes32 dataRoot = merkleize(transactions);
batches[rollupId][batchNumber] = RollupBatch({
rollupId: rollupId,
batchNumber: batchNumber,
stateRoot: stateRoot,
dataRoot: dataRoot,
timestamp: block.timestamp,
sequencer: msg.sender
});
// Store transaction data off-chain with availability proof
_storeWithAvailabilityProof(rollupId, batchNumber, transactions);
emit BatchPosted(rollupId, batchNumber, stateRoot, dataRoot);
}
// Fraud proof requires data availability
function challengeStateTransition(
uint256 rollupId,
uint256 batchNumber,
bytes calldata fraudProof,
bytes calldata batchData
) external {
RollupBatch memory batch = batches[rollupId][batchNumber];
// Verify data matches commitment
require(
merkleize(batchData) == batch.dataRoot,
"Invalid data"
);
// Verify fraud proof
bool isValid = IFraudProver(rollupContracts[rollupId])
.verifyFraudProof(
batch.stateRoot,
batchData,
fraudProof
);
if (isValid) {
// Slash sequencer and revert state
_handleFraudProven(rollupId, batchNumber);
}
}
}
4. Hybrid Storage Solutions
On-chain/Off-chain Hybrid
// Intelligent data placement
contract HybridStorage {
enum StorageTier {
HOT, // On-chain, frequently accessed
WARM, // IPFS with on-chain hash
COLD, // Arweave for permanent storage
ARCHIVE // Compressed off-chain storage
}
struct DataRecord {
bytes32 id;
bytes32 contentHash;
StorageTier tier;
string location; // URI for off-chain storage
uint256 accessCount;
uint256 lastAccess;
}
mapping(bytes32 => DataRecord) public records;
// Intelligently store based on predicted access patterns
function storeData(
bytes calldata data,
uint256 expectedAccessFrequency
) external returns (bytes32 id) {
bytes32 contentHash = keccak256(data);
StorageTier tier = _determineTier(
data.length,
expectedAccessFrequency
);
id = keccak256(
abi.encodePacked(contentHash, msg.sender, block.timestamp)
);
if (tier == StorageTier.HOT) {
// Store on-chain
_storeOnChain(id, data);
} else {
// Store off-chain and keep hash
string memory location = _storeOffChain(data, tier);
records[id] = DataRecord({
id: id,
contentHash: contentHash,
tier: tier,
location: location,
accessCount: 0,
lastAccess: block.timestamp
});
}
emit DataStored(id, tier);
}
// Auto-migrate data between tiers based on usage
function accessData(bytes32 id) external returns (bytes memory) {
DataRecord storage record = records[id];
record.accessCount++;
record.lastAccess = block.timestamp;
// Check if tier migration needed
if (_shouldPromote(record)) {
_migrateTier(id, StorageTier(uint(record.tier) - 1));
}
return _retrieveData(record);
}
}
5. State Rent and Pruning
Economic Incentives for State Management
// State rent mechanism
contract StateRent {
struct StateEntry {
address owner;
uint256 size;
uint256 lastPayment;
uint256 balance;
}
mapping(bytes32 => StateEntry) public stateEntries;
uint256 public constant RENT_PER_BYTE_PER_BLOCK = 1 gwei;
uint256 public constant GRACE_PERIOD = 90 days;
// Pay rent for state storage
function payRent(bytes32 stateId) external payable {
StateEntry storage entry = stateEntries[stateId];
entry.balance += msg.value;
entry.lastPayment = block.timestamp;
emit RentPaid(stateId, msg.value);
}
// Calculate rent due
function rentDue(bytes32 stateId) public view returns (uint256) {
StateEntry memory entry = stateEntries[stateId];
uint256 blocksSincePayment = block.number - entry.lastPayment;
return entry.size * RENT_PER_BYTE_PER_BLOCK * blocksSincePayment;
}
// Evict state if rent not paid
function evictState(bytes32 stateId) external {
StateEntry memory entry = stateEntries[stateId];
require(
block.timestamp > entry.lastPayment + GRACE_PERIOD,
"Still in grace period"
);
uint256 rentOwed = rentDue(stateId);
require(entry.balance < rentOwed, "Rent paid");
// Archive state before deletion
_archiveState(stateId);
// Delete from active state
delete stateEntries[stateId];
emit StateEvicted(stateId, entry.owner);
}
}
Recommendations
1. DA Architecture for Lux
recommended_architecture:
primary_da_solution:
chain: "Z-Chain specialized for DA"
technology: "KZG commitments with DAS"
features:
- "Sub-second commitment generation"
- "Logarithmic proof size"
- "Fraud-proof compatible"
storage_tiers:
hot:
location: "On-chain"
use_case: "Active state, recent blocks"
retention: "Permanent"
warm:
location: "IPFS cluster"
use_case: "Recent transaction data"
retention: "1 year"
cold:
location: "Arweave"
use_case: "Historical data"
retention: "Permanent"
rollup_support:
optimistic: "7-day challenge with DA proofs"
zk: "Immediate finality with validity proofs"
sovereign: "Independent DA with Lux security"
2. Implementation Strategy
- Phase 1: Basic DA commitments on existing chains
- Phase 2: Z-Chain specialization for DA
- Phase 3: Full DAS implementation
- Phase 4: Rollup ecosystem support
3. Economic Model
- Storage Fees: Time-based pricing for data storage
- Sampling Rewards: Incentivize light client participation
- State Rent: Ongoing fees for active state
- Archival Incentives: Rewards for historical data preservation
Implementation Roadmap
Phase 1: Basic DA (Q1 2025)
- Data commitment registry
- Basic availability proofs
- IPFS integration
Phase 2: Advanced DA (Q2 2025)
- KZG commitment scheme
- DAS implementation
- State rent mechanism
Phase 3: Ecosystem Integration (Q3 2025)
- Rollup DA support
- Cross-chain DA verification
- Economic incentives
Related Repositories
- DA Layer: https://github.com/luxfi/data-availability
- State Management: https://github.com/luxfi/state-rent
- IPFS Gateway: https://github.com/luxfi/ipfs-gateway
- Archival Node: https://github.com/luxfi/archive-node
Open Questions
- Consensus Integration: How to integrate DA with consensus?
- Light Client Security: Trust assumptions for sampling?
- Cross-Chain DA: Shared DA layer for all chains?
- Regulatory Compliance: Data retention requirements?
Conclusion
Data availability is a critical challenge for blockchain scalability. Lux's multi-chain architecture provides unique opportunities to create specialized DA solutions that balance security, efficiency, and decentralization. By leveraging Z-Chain for specialized DA functions and implementing modern techniques like DAS and KZG commitments, Lux can support a thriving ecosystem of rollups and high-throughput applications.
References
Copyright
Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.
Specification
Algorithms, data structures, and parameters in this LP are normative and MUST be followed.
Rationale
Provides a pragmatic, secure path aligned with Lux’s ecosystem needs.
Backwards Compatibility
Additive; existing components remain compatible. Adoption can be staged.
Security Considerations
Adhere to best practices for validation, authentication, and cryptography to mitigate threats.