MEV Protection Research
Research on Maximum Extractable Value (MEV) mitigation strategies for Lux Network
Abstract
This research LP explores Maximum Extractable Value (MEV) protection mechanisms for the Lux Network, analyzing how validators and searchers extract value, the impact on users, and mitigation strategies. It examines how Lux's multi-chain architecture and unique consensus mechanisms can provide innovative solutions to MEV-related problems.
Motivation
MEV protection is critical for:
- User Protection: Prevent sandwich attacks and frontrunning
- Fair Markets: Ensure equal access to trading opportunities
- Network Security: Align validator incentives with users
- DeFi Health: Reduce toxic arbitrage and manipulation
- Adoption: Improve user experience and trust
Current State
MEV in Lux Ecosystem
- C-Chain: EVM-compatible, susceptible to traditional MEV
- X-Chain: UTXO model, different MEV dynamics
- DEX Activity: Primary MEV source on Lux
- Current Protection: Limited to slippage tolerance
MEV Vectors Identified
// MEV opportunities across Lux chains
interface MEVLandscape {
sandwich_attacks: {
frequency: "High on C-Chain DEXs";
impact: "$100K+ daily";
victims: "Retail traders";
};
arbitrage: {
types: ["Cross-DEX", "Cross-chain", "Liquidations"];
volume: "$500K+ daily";
beneficiaries: "Searchers and validators";
};
frontrunning: {
targets: ["Token launches", "NFT mints", "Oracle updates"];
prevention: "Currently minimal";
};
}
Research Findings
1. Fair Ordering Mechanisms
Threshold Encrypted Mempool
// Encrypted mempool with threshold decryption
contract EncryptedMempool {
struct EncryptedTx {
bytes encryptedData;
bytes32 commitment;
uint256 revealBlock;
address sender;
}
mapping(bytes32 => EncryptedTx) public pendingTxs;
mapping(uint256 => bytes32[]) public blockTxs;
// Threshold encryption parameters
uint256 public constant THRESHOLD = 67; // 67% of validators
uint256 public constant REVEAL_DELAY = 2; // blocks
function submitEncrypted(
bytes calldata encryptedData,
bytes32 commitment
) external {
bytes32 txId = keccak256(
abi.encodePacked(encryptedData, block.number)
);
pendingTxs[txId] = EncryptedTx({
encryptedData: encryptedData,
commitment: commitment,
revealBlock: block.number + REVEAL_DELAY,
sender: msg.sender
});
blockTxs[block.number + REVEAL_DELAY].push(txId);
emit TxSubmitted(txId, block.number + REVEAL_DELAY);
}
// Validators collectively decrypt at reveal time
function revealBatch(
uint256 blockNumber,
bytes[] calldata decryptionShares
) external onlyValidator {
require(block.number >= blockNumber, "Too early");
require(
decryptionShares.length >= (validators.length * THRESHOLD) / 100,
"Insufficient shares"
);
bytes32[] memory txIds = blockTxs[blockNumber];
for (uint256 i = 0; i < txIds.length; i++) {
bytes memory decrypted = thresholdDecrypt(
pendingTxs[txIds[i]].encryptedData,
decryptionShares
);
// Execute transaction
_executeTx(decrypted);
}
}
}
2. Commit-Reveal Auction for Block Space
Priority Gas Auction Alternative
// Sealed bid block space auction
contract BlockSpaceAuction {
struct Bid {
bytes32 commitment;
uint256 amount;
bool revealed;
address bidder;
}
mapping(uint256 => mapping(address => Bid)) public blockBids;
mapping(uint256 => address[]) public blockWinners;
uint256 public constant COMMIT_DURATION = 10; // blocks
uint256 public constant REVEAL_DURATION = 5; // blocks
uint256 public constant SLOTS_PER_BLOCK = 100;
// Commit phase - submit sealed bid
function commitBid(
uint256 targetBlock,
bytes32 commitment
) external payable {
require(
block.number < targetBlock - REVEAL_DURATION,
"Commit phase ended"
);
blockBids[targetBlock][msg.sender] = Bid({
commitment: commitment,
amount: msg.value,
revealed: false,
bidder: msg.sender
});
}
// Reveal phase - reveal bid amount
function revealBid(
uint256 targetBlock,
uint256 bidAmount,
uint256 nonce
) external {
require(
block.number >= targetBlock - REVEAL_DURATION &&
block.number < targetBlock,
"Not in reveal phase"
);
Bid storage bid = blockBids[targetBlock][msg.sender];
require(!bid.revealed, "Already revealed");
// Verify commitment
bytes32 commitment = keccak256(
abi.encodePacked(bidAmount, nonce, msg.sender)
);
require(commitment == bid.commitment, "Invalid reveal");
bid.amount = bidAmount;
bid.revealed = true;
}
// Determine winners based on highest bids
function finalizeAuction(uint256 targetBlock) external {
require(block.number >= targetBlock, "Auction not ended");
// Sort bids and select top SLOTS_PER_BLOCK
address[] memory winners = _selectWinners(targetBlock);
blockWinners[targetBlock] = winners;
// Refund non-winners
_processRefunds(targetBlock, winners);
}
}
3. MEV Redistribution
MEV Smoothing Pool
// Redistribute MEV profits to users
contract MEVRedistribution {
struct EpochInfo {
uint256 totalMEV;
uint256 totalVolume;
mapping(address => uint256) userVolume;
mapping(address => bool) claimed;
}
mapping(uint256 => EpochInfo) public epochs;
uint256 public currentEpoch;
// Validators/searchers contribute MEV profits
function contributeMEV() external payable {
epochs[currentEpoch].totalMEV += msg.value;
emit MEVContributed(msg.sender, msg.value, currentEpoch);
}
// Track user trading volume
function recordVolume(address user, uint256 volume) external onlyDEX {
epochs[currentEpoch].userVolume[user] += volume;
epochs[currentEpoch].totalVolume += volume;
}
// Users claim MEV rebates proportional to volume
function claimMEVRebate(uint256 epoch) external {
require(epoch < currentEpoch, "Epoch not finalized");
require(!epochs[epoch].claimed[msg.sender], "Already claimed");
uint256 userVolume = epochs[epoch].userVolume[msg.sender];
uint256 totalVolume = epochs[epoch].totalVolume;
uint256 totalMEV = epochs[epoch].totalMEV;
uint256 rebate = (userVolume * totalMEV) / totalVolume;
epochs[epoch].claimed[msg.sender] = true;
payable(msg.sender).transfer(rebate);
emit MEVRebateClaimed(msg.sender, rebate, epoch);
}
}
4. Application-Specific MEV Protection
DEX-Level Protection
// MEV-resistant AMM design
contract MEVResistantAMM {
uint256 private constant PRICE_IMPACT_THRESHOLD = 100; // 1%
uint256 private constant TIME_WEIGHTED_WINDOW = 600; // 10 minutes
struct PricePoint {
uint256 price;
uint256 timestamp;
}
PricePoint[] public priceHistory;
// Use time-weighted average price
function getTWAP() public view returns (uint256) {
uint256 weightedSum = 0;
uint256 totalWeight = 0;
uint256 cutoff = block.timestamp - TIME_WEIGHTED_WINDOW;
for (uint256 i = priceHistory.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
if (priceHistory[i].timestamp < cutoff) break;
uint256 weight = block.timestamp - priceHistory[i].timestamp;
weightedSum += priceHistory[i].price * weight;
totalWeight += weight;
}
return weightedSum / totalWeight;
}
// Protect against sandwich attacks
function swap(
address tokenIn,
address tokenOut,
uint256 amountIn,
uint256 minAmountOut
) external returns (uint256 amountOut) {
uint256 twap = getTWAP();
uint256 spotPrice = getSpotPrice(tokenIn, tokenOut);
// Reject if price deviates too much from TWAP
uint256 priceImpact = ((spotPrice > twap ? spotPrice - twap : twap - spotPrice) * 10000) / twap;
require(
priceImpact <= PRICE_IMPACT_THRESHOLD,
"Price impact too high"
);
// Execute swap
amountOut = _executeSwap(tokenIn, tokenOut, amountIn);
require(amountOut >= minAmountOut, "Slippage");
// Update price history
priceHistory.push(PricePoint({
price: getSpotPrice(tokenIn, tokenOut),
timestamp: block.timestamp
}));
return amountOut;
}
}
5. Cross-Chain MEV Mitigation
Synchronized Cross-Chain Execution
// Prevent cross-chain MEV extraction
contract CrossChainMEVProtection {
struct CrossChainTx {
uint256 sourceChain;
uint256 targetChain;
bytes payload;
uint256 executeAfter;
bytes32 merkleProof;
}
mapping(bytes32 => CrossChainTx) public pendingCrossChainTxs;
mapping(uint256 => uint256) public chainSyncBlocks;
// Synchronize execution across chains
function submitCrossChainTx(
uint256 targetChain,
bytes calldata payload
) external returns (bytes32 txId) {
// Calculate synchronized execution time
uint256 sourceSync = chainSyncBlocks[block.chainid];
uint256 targetSync = chainSyncBlocks[targetChain];
uint256 executeAfter = Math.max(sourceSync, targetSync) + SYNC_DELAY;
txId = keccak256(
abi.encodePacked(
block.chainid,
targetChain,
payload,
block.timestamp
)
);
pendingCrossChainTxs[txId] = CrossChainTx({
sourceChain: block.chainid,
targetChain: targetChain,
payload: payload,
executeAfter: executeAfter,
merkleProof: bytes32(0)
});
emit CrossChainTxQueued(txId, targetChain, executeAfter);
}
// Execute only after synchronization point
function executeCrossChainTx(bytes32 txId) external {
CrossChainTx memory tx = pendingCrossChainTxs[txId];
require(block.number >= tx.executeAfter, "Too early");
require(tx.merkleProof != bytes32(0), "Not verified");
// Execute payload
_execute(tx.payload);
delete pendingCrossChainTxs[txId];
}
}
Recommendations
1. MEV Protection Architecture
recommended_architecture:
network_level:
mempool: "Threshold encrypted"
ordering: "Fair sequencing service"
consensus: "MEV-aware block production"
protocol_level:
dex_protection:
- "TWAP oracles"
- "Commit-reveal swaps"
- "Dynamic fees based on volatility"
lending_protection:
- "Gradual liquidations"
- "Dutch auction liquidations"
- "MEV rebates to borrowers"
user_level:
tools:
- "MEV protection aggregator"
- "Private transaction relayer"
- "MEV rebate tracker"
2. Implementation Strategy
- Phase 1: Basic protection (private mempools)
- Phase 2: Fair ordering (threshold encryption)
- Phase 3: MEV redistribution (smoothing pools)
- Phase 4: Advanced features (cross-chain sync)
3. Ecosystem Incentives
- Validator Rewards: Extra rewards for MEV protection compliance
- User Rebates: Share MEV profits with affected users
- Builder Competition: Encourage ethical block building
- Protocol Revenue: Capture MEV for protocol development
Implementation Roadmap
Phase 1: Basic Protection (Q1 2025)
- Private mempool implementation
- Basic frontrun protection
- MEV monitoring dashboard
Phase 2: Fair Ordering (Q2 2025)
- Threshold encrypted mempool
- Commit-reveal for sensitive txs
- Fair sequencing rules
Phase 3: MEV Redistribution (Q3 2025)
- MEV smoothing pools
- User rebate system
- Cross-chain MEV tracking
Related Repositories
- MEV Protection: https://github.com/luxfi/mev-protection
- Fair Sequencer: https://github.com/luxfi/sequencer
- MEV Dashboard: https://github.com/luxfi/mev-dashboard
- Flashbots Integration: https://github.com/luxfi/flashbots
Open Questions
- Validator Incentives: How to ensure validators adopt MEV protection?
- Cross-Chain Coordination: How to prevent cross-chain MEV?
- Privacy Trade-offs: Balance between privacy and transparency?
- Regulatory Concerns: Is MEV manipulation market manipulation?
Conclusion
MEV protection is crucial for Lux Network's success as a fair and efficient DeFi platform. By leveraging multi-chain architecture, threshold encryption, and innovative redistribution mechanisms, Lux can provide best-in-class MEV protection while maintaining decentralization and performance.
References
Copyright
Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.
Specification
Normative sections define the processes, data formats, and constants required for interoperability.
Rationale
The approach optimizes for clarity and resilience consistent with Lux’s architecture.
Backwards Compatibility
Additive; no breaking changes to current APIs or formats.
Security Considerations
Validate untrusted inputs, secure key material, and mitigate replay/DoS per recommendations.